Hotline: +381 61 63 84 071
NGO Atina part of the appeal of Coalition Against Discrimination and partner organizations
![](http://www.atina.org.rs/sites/default/files/bully%20NGO%20Atina.jpg)
"Competent authorities to withdraw the proposed Amending Act on the Anti-discrimination Law“
The Coalition Against Discrimination and partner organizations demand from the competent authorities to withdraw from the adoption procedure proposed Amending Act on the Anti-discrimination Law because representatives of vulnerable and discriminated groups, and the general public, had no opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed legal solutions.
The text of the draft Act has an extremely large number of shortcomings; therefore, it is necessary to postpone its adoption and enable all interested parties to provide their respective feedback, cites the Coalition's request.
The Government of the Republic of Serbia has recently prepared a proposed Amending Act on the Anti-discrimination Law. Contrary to the legal rules governing the drafting and adoption procedure of draft laws, the parties interested in the content of the Act were not allowed to participate in its drafting, nor was a public discussion on the proposed solutions held before the Government formally adopted them. This is also stated in item 9. Analysis of the effects of the Act that was submitted to the National Assembly along with the proposed Amending Act.
The lack of a wider debate on the new legal solutions directly prevented interested parties from making a constructive contribution to the quality of the proposed Act, and above all, from contributing to the elimination of its numerous shortcomings, which can be divided into four groups.
The first group consists of linguistically meaningless or impossible linguistic structures, but also of spelling errors. For example, the text uses the word "doesnotjustify" (the whole phrase is written as one word) and states that "harassment...which is aimed at or constitutes a violation of dignity..." (impossible linguistic structure). The second group of shortcomings indicate that the amendments are not proposed in accordance with the law drafting rules. For example, in a contradictory manner, the act authorizes the Commissioner to process names and other personal data of the parties in the ongoing court discrimination-related proceedings, but at the same time imposes the obligation to anonymize those data before the submission of the court judgments to the Commissioner.
The third group consists of legal and systemic shortcomings that prevent the adequate implementation of the Act, such as deleting general procedural guarantees pertaining to the complaint proceedings, thus jeopardizing the rights of the parties in the proceedings and paving the way for arbitrary decision-making on the part of the Commissioner.
Finally, the fourth group of shortcomings are of legal and political nature and cast doubt on the actual intent of the author of the proposed amendments, such as the authorization of the Commissioner to decide not to act upon a complaint if they find that the purpose of the proceedings can be achieved by issuing a public warning, or the introduction of misdemeanor fines ten times higher than the currently prescribed ones, without any reasoning behind it.
"Given that the number of these shortcomings exceeds the number of proposed amendments, and especially taking into account the fact that their adoption would significantly aggravate the status of the parties concerned with this Act, we consider it necessary to withdraw the proposed Act from adoption without any delay, and then enable all interested parties to participate in the improvement of the legal text at hand", the Coalition states.
Coalition Against Discrimination is comprised of: Center for the advancement of legal studies, Civil Rights Defenders, Labris – organization for lesbian human rights, Network of Committees for Human Rights (CHRIS Network), Association of students with disabilities, Gayten LGBT, Praxis and Jednakost.
Organizations supporting the initiative:
Humanitarian Rights Fund
Education Center Leskovac
YUROM CENTER
Sandžak Board for the protection of human rights and freedoms
Novi Sad Humanitarian Center
Crisis Policy and Response Center
NGO Atina
IzKruga Niš
PONS Foundation
Autonomous Women's Center
Zrenjanin Center for equal rights
LICEULICE
Astra – Anti-trafficking Action
NGO „OFER“, Bujanovac
A11 – Initiative for Economic and Social Rights
Association of persons with disability "Jednakost“ Prijepolje
Association of Roma-Serbian friendship Stablo
Local Democracy Center LDA
YUCOM
Peščanik
Youth initiative for human rights
Group Izađi
Helsinki Committee for human rights in Serbia
Roma Initiative for Sustainable Development (Belgrade)
Roma Center (Požega)
Association of Belgrade Roma (Belgrade)
Roma sports association Sloboda (Belgrade)
Chess club Sloboda (Belgrade)
Voice of minority (Ripanj)
Roma media service (Belgrade)
RHU ROM LAZAREVAC
National team of Roma from Serbia (Belgrade)
Roma world (Niš)
ERA – LGBTI Equal Rights Association for Western Balkans and Turkey
Women in Black
Reconstruction women's fund
Da Se Zna!
IZI VelikiMali
Civil Society Development Center Protecta
Heartefact Fund
Belgrade Pride
Queeria
Roma students association Novi Sad
Roma Association Sloboda
Tekst u originalu možete čitati putem linka: https://www.danas.rs/drustvo/nadlezni-da-povuku-predlog-izmena-zakona-o-...